<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deleting All Messages in Exchange OWA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beyondabstraction.net/2008/10/02/deleting-all-messages-in-exchange-owa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beyondabstraction.net/2008/10/02/deleting-all-messages-in-exchange-owa/</link>
	<description>Meanderings and Such...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spencer</title>
		<link>http://beyondabstraction.net/2008/10/02/deleting-all-messages-in-exchange-owa/comment-page-1/#comment-22430</link>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondabstraction.net/?p=119#comment-22430</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
find . -maxdepth 1 -name \*.EML -print0 &#124; xargs -0 -L 100 rm
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good call Ross.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
find . -maxdepth 1 -name \*.EML -print0 | xargs -0 -L 100 rm
</p></blockquote>
<p>Good call Ross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://beyondabstraction.net/2008/10/02/deleting-all-messages-in-exchange-owa/comment-page-1/#comment-22427</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondabstraction.net/?p=119#comment-22427</guid>
		<description>Just shooting in the dark here, but wouldn&#039;t something like this be faster than your for-loop rm: 

find . -maxdepth 1 -name \*.EML -print0 &#124; xargs -0 -L 100 rm

Which will do the deletions in batches of 100 instead of spawning a separate process for each deletion. (You can, of course, embiggen or shrink the -L parameter to find the maximal line length)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just shooting in the dark here, but wouldn&#8217;t something like this be faster than your for-loop rm: </p>
<p>find . -maxdepth 1 -name \*.EML -print0 | xargs -0 -L 100 rm</p>
<p>Which will do the deletions in batches of 100 instead of spawning a separate process for each deletion. (You can, of course, embiggen or shrink the -L parameter to find the maximal line length)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
